ARE 4.0 – Programming, Planning and Practice

areThis morning I sat down for the 5th of 7 ARE (Architects Registration Exam) sections. The title of this latest gem: Programming, Planning and Practice. What does that mean, you ask? Well, if you have taken the exam, or know someone who has, or follow the ARE Forums you know this exam basically covers most anything under the sun. And I can mostly confirm this. And so, as with other posts on the subject, below is an overview of what and how I studied as well as my thoughts on the exam content – both graphic and multiple choice.

What I studied:

I have found so far, with most of the exams that extensive study beyond what is contained in the Kaplan/Ballast study books, practice software and flash cards is unnecessary and incredibly stressful. The ARE as a whole tests your basic knowledge of principles and design and systems, as well as your general ability to follow the simplest of instructions regardless of what you think is right or wrong. So, getting into the nitty gritty and detail of every aspect of architecture and building engineering….not really necessary. This exam is no different.

The Test – my reaction:

The critiques and reviews of this exam on the ARE Forums are pretty spot on. The Multiple Choice section wasn’t completely all over the place, but there were a fair amount of WTF questions that did not appear in the study materials. There was a very heavy concentration on Programming, Contracts and “most appropriate” or “best practice” kind of questions. The section is 120 minutes long and only 85 questions. I finished with a good 26 minutes left on the clock and that was after reviewing every single question a second time and verifying my answers. The first go around I took about 30 seconds for each question, which was plenty of time to carefully read and understand each word in the question given and understand what exactly they were trying to get at. This is critical for all of the multiple choice sections so far – understand the English language and really READ the questions. I honestly have no clear feeling of how I did on this section. It’s a real 50/50 shot in the dark.

The Graphic Section, however….seriously…it’s kind of a joke. If I failed this section I will appeal the decision because there’s no way in hell. Like most of the graphic exam sections, you have to read the instructions/program and DO WHAT IT SAYS. Nothing more, nothing less, just do EXACTLY what it says. The way I accomplish this is simply by writing it all down and having that program list right in front of my face as I’m working through it on screen. As I complete each requirement I scratch through it and move on to the next. Once finished, I go back through and verify each item on the list, scratch it off again and then check one last time to make sure I didn’t miss something stupid. You’ve got 60 minutes for the Site Zoning Vignette. After I finished, checked, rechecked and then checked one last time I still had 20 minutes left.

All told, for a 4 hour exam, I finished in 2 1/2 hours, including my 15 minute break. And in about 4 weeks I’ll know if what I studied was enough. Good luck to all the candidates out there.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “ARE 4.0 – Programming, Planning and Practice

  1. I can’t say much about this exam since I took in on paper in 3,421 BC (ok, 1995 AD). However, I still sense a stigma or false anger about it that its unfair, arduous and a poor measure of competency. I’m sure its not perfect, but it sounds like IF you are PREPARED and LUCID, you should do just fine. I think you should circulate your experiences more among the emerging professionals community, cut to the chase and expose the real truth of this experience.

    BTW, I’m sure you aced it.

    • Lee, the tests as try stand currently are not in my opinion a good test of competency, but it’s what we’ve got so I keep chugging along.
      As far as my experience, I think I did a decent job of that. I can’t really go deeper without violating disclosures of the exam and I don’t know if I passed, but rest assured an update will be posted.
      BTW, I’d much rather go back in time and take the written test.

      • I like having taken it on paper, but we had no other choice. Of course I took all of it in 4 days. Now I can brag with those “when I was your age” stories.

      • And now we have no choice but to take it online. I also had no choice when I was halfway through version 3.1 when they switched over to 4.0 and said “oh by the way you have to start over from scratch”….I could go on and on and on…but it’s not terribly productive. I’m almost done. Once I am, I’ll join the distinguished ranks of “when I was your age”. 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s